Roland Mainz writes: > Peter Memishian wrote: > > > > > Why so many complains for one simple bug? > > > > It is not one simple bug, it is the latest in a sequence of bugs related > > to this change. There is a case to be made that some of these bugs could > > have been caught prior to integration given more testing, such as 6790805 > > and 6793120. There were also more subtle bugs (such as 6805584) that I > > doubt we would've caught. There are others that have not yet been > > root-caused, such as 6800517. > > Erm... what is http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6800517 ?
It's a failure in an internal name service switch test suite. Nobody knows what the problem is (it hasn't been root-caused yet), or if any of the later fixes address it, but the workaround is to remove the ksh93 /usr/bin/sleep from the system and replace with the old binary. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
