April Chin wrote: > > Peter Memishian wrote: [snip] > > > There's no precedent for doing that, nor do I think it's all that useful > > > given that deleted_files gets purged at the end of each release train. > > > > Do you mean that the files will not longer accessible even within Sun ? > > By purged, Peter means that the gate for the next release will not > carry over the deleted_files/ from the current release. > The deleted_files/ from this release will still be around if one > goes back to look at the old release gate. > > So potentially, as time goes on, the ksh93 deleted_files listed in > usr/src/lib/libshell/misc/filelist.txt could be scattered > among different release gates, if more unreferenced files get > added to the original AT&T source.
Mhhh... fun... ;-( ... what would be your preferred choice - delete the files before the putback or do the two-stage putback (e.g. first commit all files, then do a 2nd commit to remove the unreferenced ones) ? ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;)
