in the patch the S_IFSOCK default assumes AF_INET without checking for it and then makes inet_* calls to get the addr and port shouldn't AF_INET still guard inet_* addr translation?
- [ksh93-integration-discuss] Patch to support IPv6 in ksh93/li... Roland Mainz
- [ksh93-integration-discuss] Re: Patch to support IPv6 in... Glenn Fowler
