David Korn wrote: > > Subject: Re: Re: [ksh93-integration-discuss] building extensions to ksh93 > -------- > > > > > The idea was to have a tool which customers/users/developers can use on > > their side to verify that ksh93 works correctly before calling support > > and complaining that there is something "broken". > > I don't think that this is needed for regression test since > these tests should be done at the completion of the build > process as part of an acceptance test.
This is exactly what we are currently doing in the ksh93-integration prototype002 and prototype003 codebase - after ksh93 finishes linking the test suite is run to make sure that the resulting binary is Ok. The question is whether this design surives the OS/Net code review... ;-/ ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;)
