It was approved. (The delivery was slightly broadened and the phasing removed in the final, approved spec., but the end state is the same.)
We are implementing as we speak. - cheers, - jek3 > Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:09:07 +0200 > From: "I. Szczesniak" <iszczesniak at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [ksh93-integration-discuss] libcmd must die [PSARC-EXT/2006/561 Timeout: 09/05/2006] > To: Joseph Kowalski <Joseph.Kowalski at eng.sun.com>, Korn Shell 93 integration/migration project discussion <ksh93-integration-discuss at opensolaris.org> > Cc: PSARC-EXT at sac.sfbay.sun.com, Rod.Evans at sun.com, roger.faulkner at > sun.com, don.cragun at sun.com, roland.mainz at nrubsig.or > MIME-version: 1.0 > Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT > Content-disposition: inline > DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-t ype:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Bj/UEukcZaBsklzawIFJW1irqjVRWhtHp/V8pkpENGOp/pHp21VnMlZYlwdu1pXjPjFNggupjoz0V6 r166HLE+5UCDjhTX0xxuWQYufMYU39Oad6i+C7rzw1dwQUV+SIfvXoez7ntNRze5Kkd4EFq1Qw9ZXstF YaXQyifgkg8LU= > X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296 > > On 9/29/06, Joseph Kowalski <Joseph.Kowalski at eng.sun.com> wrote: > > > > Please ignore what appears to be another initial posting of this case > > automatically generated by the tools. It will only be seen by some of > > you. > > > > I'm sponsoring this case for myself. It is the proposed resolution of > > the libcmd collision issue associated with PSARC/2006/550. > > > > Note, that dispite the fact this discussion was characterized as "dumb", > > the resolution is so simple as to almost qualify for "Closed Approved > > Automatic". The only reasons I believe it doesn't is that it actually > > established an interface taxonomy level for the def*() routines and > > proposes to be allowed to integrate as two separate integrations rather > > than the single integration standard applied to all ARC cases. > > > > For those unfamiliar with "Closed Approved Automatic", it is for cases > > where the implementation follows well defined practices used be previous > > projects and the case is strictly to record the name space implications. > > Its best that this type of submission only be used by ARC Professionals > > (do not attempt this at home). > > > > This case times out on Thursday, October 5th, 2006. > > Was this case approved or not? > > Irek
