The <ast-users at mailman.research.att.com> list appears to be broken since two weeks. Can someone check out what's wrong there?
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mail Delivery System <[email protected]> Date: Dec 2, 2006 9:53 PM Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender To: joshhurst at gmail.com This is the Postfix program at host mail-dark.research.att.com. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The Postfix program <ast-users at mailman.research.att.com> (expanded from <ast-users at research.att.com>): delivery temporarily suspended: connect to mailman.research.att.com[135.207.24.12]: Connection timed out Final-Recipient: rfc822; ast-users at mailman.research.att.com Original-Recipient: rfc822; ast-users at research.att.com Action: failed Status: 4.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; delivery temporarily suspended: connect to mailman.research.att.com[135.207.24.12]: Connection timed out ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Josh Hurst" <[email protected]> To: "Peter Lord" <peter at plord.co.uk>, ast-users at research.att.com Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 21:05:17 +0100 Subject: Re: rfe: Create a subversion database for ast+ksh sources? (was: Re: [ast-users] old releases ...) On 8/29/06, Josh Hurst <joshhurst at gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/21/06, Josh Hurst <joshhurst at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 7/20/06, Martin Schaffstall <martin.schaffstall at googlemail.com> wrote: > > > On 7/20/06, Peter Lord <peter at plord.co.uk> wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > Is there somewhere where I can download older ksh releases ? ( > > > > stand-alone binaries ) I have an issue I would like to investigate > > > > which the behaviour differs between ksh93 releases. > > > > > > In a related matter - would you (David, Glenn) be interested to create > > > a public Subversion database from which the ast+ksh sources, official > > > and alphas - can be obtained from? > > > > I think this is a good idea to put all of AST - including ksh93 - > > under version control by CVS, git or Subversion. > > David, Glenn - any comments? You don't like the idea, right? Josh
