On Thu 24 Aug 2006 at 12:54AM, Dan Price wrote:
> To take a step back, you've articulated that some of the things I've
> asked about stand in the way of making ksh = ksh93 is script
> compatibility for customers and ISV products (which I don't want to open
> as a question here. I'll leave that to the true ksh experts and to
> PSARC).
I dropped some words here. Let me try again:
"To take a step back, you've articulated that considering some of the
things I've asked about would stand in the way of having ksh = ksh93.
To my mind, the only thing which should stand in the way is
script compatibility for customers and ISV products (which I don't want
to open as a question here. I'll leave that to the true ksh experts and
to PSARC)."
Hopefully that makes more sense.
-dp
--
Daniel Price - Solaris Kernel Engineering - dp at eng.sun.com - blogs.sun.com/dp
