April Chin <April.Chin at eng.sun.com> wrote:
> > Even no drafts or standard proposals (well, I am worrying what the Linux
> > people may do with the API... ;-( ) ?
>
> I asked our standards expert, and there is nothing being proposed for
> extended attributes, e.g., no specifications for -@ options for
> utilities. There is a draft of a subset of functionality for
> *at() interfaces (operations against
> a path relative to a fd) proposed for *possible* inclusion in the next
> revision of SUSv3, but again, not dealing with extended attributes.
What has been done for the next revision of SUSv3 was to try adding the
syscall interface - and this only with regards to relative addressing not to
use extended attributes.
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
