>Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote: >> >> There are, of course, many issues with the compatibility of the >> >> builtins and the Solaris versions; e.g., chmod has grown a number >> >> of new options relating to ACLs recently. >> > >> >Which options do you mean? IMO it would be a good thing when the >> >manual pages themselves reflect such changes, e.g. in which release an >> >option was added, removed or changed. >> >> chmod [-fR] acl_operation file... >> >> This was added in Nevada with zfs. > >Can we contribute that code back to the ksh93 people ? usr/cmd/chmod/ >carries a AT&T copyright so I hope that exchanging code between both >projects (Solaris vs, ast/ksh93) can be done without asking the Sun >lawyers for each single line... or not ?
Well, considering that you wrote the code, I'm sure you can give it to whoever you want. Casper
