Ienup Sung wrote: > Roland Mainz wrote at 08/14/09 17:16: > > [I'ce CC'ed Ienup Sung <Ienup.Sung at Sun.COM> and Masaki Katakai > > <katakai at japan.sun.com> for the i18n parts and Don Cragun > > <dcragun at sonic.net> as standards expert] > > > > During testing of a new version of the AST "wc" (not the version for > > ksh93-integration update2, this one is a newer one) we hit the issue > > below where two of the testcases show different results for AST "wc", > > GNU coreutils "wc" and Solaris /usr/bin/wc ... > > ... the question is now: What is the expected (from an i18n+standards > > point of view) output for both testcases ? > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Subject: wc broken on GNU and Solaris > > Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:57:14 -0400 > > From: David Korn <dgk at research.att.com> > > To: roland.mainz at nrubsig.org > > > > I have attached two one line files below. > > > > The file oneline1 when run with the GNU /usr/bin/wc -mwl in > > the en_US.UTF-8 shows 1 word. The Solaris version shows 17 > > which is correct. > > > > However, for oneline2, the Solaris version shows 32 and the > > Gnu version shows 17 which I believe is correct. > > Ours shows 17 for both. > > > > ======================================== [snip] > Fri Aug 14 18:56:43 PDT 2009 > opensolaris% env LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 /usr/bin/wc -mwl oneline? > 1 17 75 oneline1 > 1 17 59 oneline2 > 2 34 134 total > opensolaris% env LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 /usr/gnu/bin/wc -mwl oneline? > 1 17 75 oneline1 > 1 17 59 oneline2 > 2 34 134 total > opensolaris% > > Was there any specific environment setup that I missed?
No, not that I am aware of... ... can you check the Solaris 8 and Solaris 9 versions of /usr/bin/wc whether they print any other numbers, please (I'm trying to figure out where the value "32" comes from) ? ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797 (;O/ \/ \O;)
