On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:35:40 +0200, Alan Grimes <agri...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> P Zoltan wrote: >> You said before that there are some book about modified nodal analysis >> (?). What is the theoretical complexiti of that algorithm? Looking at >> the >> current implementation, it seem to me that ktechlab implementation is >> needlessly too complex. > > I've been using the documentation from this project: > http://qucs.sourceforge.net/ > > -- Actually, I had not looked at where that paper had come from before, > maybe we can use parts of their software too! > > [[ reads site more ]]... It might actually be the case that it makes > sense to merge projects... They seem to be trying to re-invent ktechlab > where we have a great gui and they seem to be super-geniuses when it > comes to simulation.... > > The PDF was handed around on the mailing list some time ago. > I'll look on that. Maybe there is something useful. The big difference is that we want to make interactive simulation, while they not. This is an essential difference. > > I care far more about bugs and essential features than speed at this > point. > > Having a correct, well designed algorithm sounds like an essential feature for me. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Ktechlab-devel mailing list Ktechlab-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ktechlab-devel
