Thanks for the feedback, Micke! Would you mind reaching out privately? We'd
love to understand more where things failed.

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Micke Lisinge <[email protected]> wrote:

> I upgraded our cluster to 1.4 and GCI which caused multiple of our
> deployments to stop working. I created a new node pool and specified the
> old container image and the deployments started working again.
>
> After some testing it looks like all the docker images has problem binding
> to the correct interfaces.
> Testing a simple ruby container running a bare bones sinatra app fails to
> run on a GCI node but succeeds when binding to 0.0.0.0. (If you are
> interested i would be happy to push the sinatra app and dockerfiles to
> github)
>
> We also run a spray-can container using the java image which seems to have
> some problems even though binding to 0.0.0.0.
>
> I solved it by binding sinatra to 0.0.0.0 but as i said i still have some
> problem with the java app, but i havent had time that much time testing the
> java app yet.
> But this still looks like a different behaviour/gap when comparing to the
> old containerVM.
>
>
> Den onsdag 5 oktober 2016 kl. 19:51:25 UTC+2 skrev Alexander Mohr:
>>
>> ... and if anyone has other requests or notices other gaps between GCI
>> and the older containerVM, please do let us know!
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:50 AM, 'Vishnu Kannan' via Kubernetes user
>> discussion and Q&A <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> FYI: We are also actively working on adding support for Gluster in GCI.
>>> #34127 <https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/34127> tracks
>>> the integration.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 10:27 AM, 'Alex Mohr' via Kubernetes user
>>> discussion and Q&A <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Joshua and Hilda, I don't think it will affect future upgrades if you
>>>> use the older image for now.
>>>>
>>>> In more detail, we plan to release 1.5 in early-to-mid December; that
>>>> version is likely to only support the newer ContainerVM image because the
>>>> older version is based on an upstream-deprecated Debian 7.  Until then, 1.4
>>>> will fully support the older version of the image and we'll be sure to have
>>>> a node upgrade path to 1.5 nodes running the newer image.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Hilda Merom <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 I'm facing the same problem
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday, September 29, 2016 at 6:37:02 PM UTC+7, Joshua Sindy
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> GKE 1.3.7 nodes had glusterfs-client available. New 1.4.0 clusters
>>>>>> are missing it. Error: "Output: mount: unknown filesystem type 
>>>>>> 'glusterfs'
>>>>>> ".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://kubernetes.io/docs/user-guide/volumes/ still shows glusterfs
>>>>>> as an option.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would be ideal to get the client back in the image.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If that is not possible I would like instruction on how to add it in
>>>>>> a programatic way. I haven't been able to find any documentation on doing
>>>>>> that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
  • [kubernetes-u... Joshua Sindy
    • Re: [kub... 'Alex Mohr' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
    • [kuberne... Hilda Merom
      • Re: ... 'Alex Mohr' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
        • ... 'Vishnu Kannan' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
          • ... 'Alex Mohr' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
            • ... Joshua Sindy
            • ... Micke Lisinge
              • ... 'David Aronchick' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
                • ... Micke Lisinge
    • [kuberne... László Károlyi
      • [kub... Joshua Sindy
        • ... 'Vishnu Kannan' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
          • ... laplj003
            • ... 'Vishnu Kannan' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
              • ... Jeffery LaPlante
                • ... 'Michael Rubin' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
                • ... 'Jing Xu' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A

Reply via email to