I think this is about how should we group these commands.

I think these docs may be helpful to you.
They are all under the same category: Object Management Using kubectl

https://kubernetes.io/docs/tutorials/object-management-kubectl/object-management/

https://kubernetes.io/docs/tutorials/object-management-kubectl/imperative-object-management-command/
https://kubernetes.io/docs/tutorials/object-management-kubectl/imperative-object-management-configuration/
https://kubernetes.io/docs/tutorials/object-management-kubectl/declarative-object-management-configuration/


On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 2:07 AM, 'Ian Lewis' via Kubernetes user discussion
and Q&A <[email protected]> wrote:

> FWIW I can't think of why kubectl create -f should be any different from
> kubectl apply -f. I almost want to suggest that create should be an alias
> of apply. It might be worth while to understand the use case for using
> kubectl create --save-config=false. In what situation would someone want to
> do that? i.e. *not* save LastAppliedConfig?
>
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 1:00 AM 'Ahmet Alp Balkan' via Kubernetes user
> discussion and Q&A <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> It looks like when somebody creates something using "kubectl create -f",
>> there's no command to update it the same way. When they use "kubectl
>> apply", they get a warning:
>>
>> $ kubectl create -f ns.yml
>> namespace "foo" created
>> $ kubectl apply -f ns.yml
>> *Warning: kubectl apply should be used on resource created by either
>> kubectl create --save-config or kubectl apply*
>> namespace "foo" configured
>>
>> I see adding this warning is previously discussed at #36620
>> <https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/36620> and patched in
>> #36672 <https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/36672>.
>>
>> In many of the Kubernetes tutorials, users are instructed to do "kubectl
>> create -f". Should there be a symmetrical command that lets them update the
>> resource with -f and works well with "kubectl create -f"d resources?
>> Currently, this is a source of confusion for beginners. Would setting
>> --save-config to true by default solve this problem?
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
  • [kubernetes-... 'Ahmet Alp Balkan' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
    • Re: [ku... 'Ian Lewis' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
      • Re:... 'Mengqi Yu' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
        • ... 'Ahmet Alp Balkan' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A

Reply via email to