On Wednesday, August 2, 2017, 'David Oppenheimer' via Kubernetes user
discussion and Q&A <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Rodrigo Campos <[email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
>
>> The burstable pod must be reserving something also, and that reservation
>> (not the limit when there is idle capacity) is making it impossible to
>> schedule more pods.
>>
>> IIRC, burstable or guaranteed is specially relevant when eviction needs
>> to be done (node running oom, inode exhaustion, etc.). But it is not
>> relevant at all to schedule new pods (again, iirc).
>>
>> So, I don't think this can help you. Check the docs, just in case,
>> anyways :-)
>>
>> I think some sort of priority (like schedule pods on this namespace
>> before pods on some other) was an idea, but don't know what happened to it
>> :-)
>>
>
> This is coming, currently scheduled for 1.8. Priority will be used in
> deciding "who goes pending and who gets to run when there are more pod
> request than cluster capacity" and also "who gets evicted when the node
> runs low on resources."
>

Cool, thanks! How are these features called? Or how can I know more about
them? :-)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
  • [kubernetes... bahhoo
    • Re: [k... Rodrigo Campos
      • Re... bahhoo
        • ... Rodrigo Campos
          • ... 'David Oppenheimer' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
            • ... Rodrigo Campos
              • ... 'David Oppenheimer' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A
                • ... Rodrigo Campos
            • ... bahhoo
              • ... 'David Oppenheimer' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A

Reply via email to