The main difference is that EBS and things like that are fully managed, and you should be able to assume some operational simplicity (if their capabilities meet your needs). If you need multi-writer, for example, EBS will not suffice. Clustered filesystems require YOU to operate them (for now?), so have some further administrative costs.
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 7:31 AM, DK <desmond.kirr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, what are the benefits (if any) to choosing GlusterFS/Ceph over > VsphereVolume/AWSElasticBlockStore? For a database like Postgres. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to kubernetes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to kubernetes-users@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kubernetes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to kubernetes-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
