The outdated pods are being terminated, so they should go away "soon". In the meantime it's not wrong to include them because they exist. If you want then to terminate faster, that is something you can control :)
On Sun, May 20, 2018, 9:06 AM Torsten Bronger <bron...@physik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > Hallöchen! > > 'Tim Hockin' via Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A writes: > > > Maybe I don't understand - the labels in the template are applied > > to the pod. Just label select against pods. > > If the deployment has been updated recently, I have still the > outdated pods hanging around. Do you recommend to add a version > number to the deployment's labels? > > Tschö, > Torsten. > > -- > Torsten Bronger > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to kubernetes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to kubernetes-users@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kubernetes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to kubernetes-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/kubernetes-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
