Terribly sorry, meant to comment and got distracted. The goal was that the script would actually run. I was able to verify that in a VM myself and it validates the previous SRU. The functionality was already known to actually work.
If this SRU isn't allowed through on the script actually running alone, then it allows the bug of the script simply failing to exist, which is an even bigger problem as one would have to revert what is already in kinetic updates. AFAIK, that's not allowed. From my standpoint, it's better to have a script that actually runs and does what it's meant to do as opposed to simply letting it error and crash. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to sddm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2009074 Title: [SRU Regression] SDDM display inset patch crashes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sddm/+bug/2009074/+subscriptions -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
