On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Harald Sitter <[email protected]> wrote: > This is not sufficiently specified actually. > In the past we have done re-interviewing if I am not mistaken. I > personally could also imagine that a council member proposes immediate > vote on this matter, given the missing specification of what to do and > the reasonable explanation. > > That said, if we should have to re-interview I'd like to specify the > proper procedure for this in the same meeting. Maybe someone could ask > how other councils handle this?
For Ubuntu Member, we'd just the button to reactivate them, I think. I saw someone do it for sabdfl's expiration the other day :P I believe Dan Chen's reactivation in ~core-dev was also interview-less. -- Mackenzie Morgan -- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
