On Friday 27 January 2012 16:53 Harald Sitter wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Thomas Olsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Friday 27 January 2012 16:19 Harald Sitter wrote: > >> They are not monitored by kubuntu-bugs IIRC. Then again all bugs > >> everywhere are undertriaged. Then again most bugs in kubuntu-ppa (or > >> actually generally) are not Kubuntu bugs but upstream, and if they are > >> Kubuntu then they usually get triaged and fixed rather quickly. > > > > So in general I might as well report upstream to start with? One of the > > issues I reported is probably an upstream bug, but I guess you customize > > the KDE start up script? Is it still called startkde? > > Yes, you should report to upstream unless you are in doubt and think > it might be a Kubuntu issue. That said, if more people were triaging > bugs different workflows come to mind, plus general bug response time > would be better. > > As for your two bugs... the one about nepomuk might be a version > incompatibility between nepomuk/soprano/virtuoso,
I think you are right about that. After starting re-indexing it doesn't seem to spit out that many errors. I'll give it a day or so to chew through the HDs ;-) > and the one about no > logout seems like KDM fails to restart. Which would make former a > possible Kubuntu bug a possible upstream bug. > That is after having looked at them for like 10 seconds, so that is > nothing but a lucky guess. I'll experiment a bit and report upstream on my findings. Thanks again. -- Med venlig hilsen / Best Regards Thomas Olsen -- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
