On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 16:22:53 Rohan Garg wrote: > On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:09 AM, Scott Kitterman <ubu...@kitterman.com> wrote: > > On Saturday, February 22, 2014 18:03:52 Phil Wyett wrote: > >> On Saturday 22 Feb 2014 11:48:13 Scott Kitterman wrote: > >> > On Saturday, February 22, 2014 12:08:35 Rohan Garg wrote: > >> > > > I think you are misreading that. It specifically talks about users > >> > > > >> > > potentially > >> > > > >> > > > needing to upgrade only every 4 years. > >> > > > >> > > Unless my eyes are deceiving me, the last line specifically talks > >> > > about > >> > > upgrading twice every 4 years, which equates to a support lifetime of > >> > > 2 > >> > > years? > >> > > >> > OK. In any case, I still have 5 year LTS. In addition to the reasons > >> > I > >> > mentioned previously, I don't want to accept Kubuntu being second class > >> > citizen in the Ubuntu project in any way I don't have to. > >> > > >> > I think 5 years is working out for 12.04 (so far) and I don't think we > >> > should change. > >> > > >> > Scott K > > Alright, after discussing this on IRC, a 5 year LTS should be doable. > However, IMHO we MUST transparently convey what a LTS means for > Kubuntu. Specifically, we should have a page outlining what support > means for Kubuntu specifically ( software is supported only when KDE > upstream supports it, there is absolutely NO support for software that > KDE deems unsupported ).
No. We need to provide security support for sure and support for other severe issues on a best effort basis. We shouldn't over promise, but security we have to do. Scott K -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
