On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Rohan Garg <rohang...@kubuntu.org> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Scott Kitterman <ubu...@kitterman.com> wrote: >> On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 18:49:24 Harald Sitter wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Rohan Garg <rohang...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >>> > Feel free to air any concerns you might have over here. >>> >>> I still think there should be a formal bug report for the foundations >>> team to investigate why we are not using CFQ by default anyway. >>> >>> At any rate +1 to not having shit performance on !ssds. >>> > > Ack. > >> >> Additionally, this is the kind of thing that needs an FFe now, so once it's >> sorted with foundations, then the release team needs a go at it. > > I don't see how this is a feature. It's a bug fix at the most to be > honest, upstream requires CFQ at runtime instead of Deadline, and > we're fixing that runtime dep. > > Also, I did run this past foundations a couple of months ago where I > asked if there could be any issues for Kubuntu, and off the top of > their head they could not think any. But as Harald mentioned, a bug > should be opened for the foundations team to investigate switching > back to CFQ. > > Cheers > Rohan Garg
This has been changed as of now in Utopic with this [1] upload. Additionally there is [2] for the foundations team to figure out. Cheers Rohan Garg [1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-settings/1:14.10ubuntu3 [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1310402 -- kubuntu-devel mailing list kubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
