Debian haven't made a decision as it hasn't been packaged yet. The question for now is should we diverge from probable upstream naming.
Jonathan On 2 March 2015 at 22:45, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't see a reason to diverge from Debian here. > > Scott K > > On Monday, March 02, 2015 08:24:26 PM Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > I'm packaging the Plasma 5 version of kdeconnect, I'd like to ask for a > FFe > > and any testers very welcome > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdeconnect/+bug/1427349 > > ppa:jr/ppa install kdeconnect-plasma5 > > > > Upstream releases the kdelibs4 version as kdeconnect-kde and plans to > > release the plasma 5 version as kdeconnect-plasma5. The naming is > > inelegant and debian have changed the source and binary to just > > kdeconnect. What should I name the plasma 5 version? It does overlap > and > > replace the kdelibs4 version in various ways but with be released with a > > different tar upstream. > > > > Jonathan > > > -- > kubuntu-devel mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel >
-- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
