Jonathan Riddell <[email protected]> wrote:Debian haven't made a decision as it hasn't been packaged yet. The question for now is should we diverge from probable upstream naming. Jonathan Consistency and following upstream would be my vote. Subtle changes like names can lead to lots of confusion for newbies like me. HTH RIck On 2 March 2015 at 22:45, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote: I don't see a reason to diverge from Debian here. Scott K On Monday, March 02, 2015 08:24:26 PM Jonathan Riddell wrote: > I'm packaging the Plasma 5 version of kdeconnect, I'd like to ask for a FFe > and any testers very welcome > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdeconnect/+bug/1427349 > ppa:jr/ppa install kdeconnect-plasma5 > > Upstream releases the kdelibs4 version as kdeconnect-kde and plans to > release the plasma 5 version as kdeconnect-plasma5. The naming is > inelegant and debian have changed the source and binary to just > kdeconnect. What should I name the plasma 5 version? It does overlap and > replace the kdelibs4 version in various ways but with be released with a > different tar upstream. > > Jonathan -- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
-- kubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
