On 11/19/2015 04:44 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 05:18:17PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 09:59:34AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
Ping...
Do you have any comment on this patchset? Could it be applied to somewhere
if it is okay for you?
I have no additional comments, as the memory-backend patches I
was reviewing are not included in this version. I didn't take the
time to review the TYPE_NVDIMM and ACPI changes.
No, I don't think the way guest memory is allocated here is ok. I'm
Since the DSM memory/ACPI memory was not included in this patchset, i really
do not understand what is "guest memory is allocated" exactly stands for...
sorry, I'm busy with 2.5 now, and this is clearly not 2.5 material.
I still see some pull requests were send our for 2.5 merge window today and
yesterday ...
This patchset is the simplest version we can figure out to implement basic
functionality for vNVDIMM and only minor change is needed for other code.
It would be nice and really appreciate if it can go to 2.5.
Once that's out, I'll post some suggestions.
Look forward to you suggestions.
Thanks for your time, Michael and Eduardo!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
