* Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >hm. Could you try to just do a vmresume nevertheless - maybe it works
> >but is undocumented?
>
> I'd hate to do that. There are at least three implementations of VT
> (PD, Core, Core2) and maybe more when steppings and microcode updates
> are considered. Not to mention having kvm fail when a new cpu is
> introduced is not a pleasant scenario.
lets check whether it's even possible ... Then we could ask Intel to
clarify their position on this. I can see no real reason why a vmclear
should really make it impossible to re-use the already loaded context
data /on the same CPU/. And that is the important case. When we migrate
to another CPU we have to do a VMLAUNCH anyway, upon the first execution
of that context.
Ingo
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
