Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> +/* >> + * Hypercall calling convention: >> + * >> + * RAX is the hypercall index, goes from 0 to __NR_hypercalls-1 >> + * >> + * Each hypercall may have 0-6 parameters. >> + * >> + * parameters 1-6 are in the standard gcc x86_64 calling convention >> + * order: RDI, RSI, RDX, RCX, R8, R9. >> + * >> + * 32-bit parameters are: EDI, ESI, EDX, ECX, EBX, EBP >> + */ >> > > about the 32-bit side: maybe it gives us a bit more options for later if > we pick the natural order for 32-bit too: EBX for index, EAX, EDX, ECX > for the first 3 parameters, with the remaining 3 parameters in ESI, EDI, > EBP? Most hypercalls will have 0, 1, 2 or 3 parameters. >
I don't mind, as long as it's clearly documented. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
