Ingo Molnar wrote: > i really really think KVM and lhype should merge, creating KVM/HVM > (Hardware Virtual Machine) and KVM/LL (Linux on Linux).
This is only sufficient if either KVM with paravirt Linux kernels has no performance penalty or lhype becomes able to execute paravirt Linux kernels. I can certainly attest that there is a lot of demand for running Linux domains with kernels other than the one running on the hardware. This is Xen's bread and butter and from the albeit old numbers I've seen so far KVM has problems competing. -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
