On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 07:20:57AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > Heiko Carstens wrote: > >On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 03:53:12PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > > > >>This patchset updates the kvm userspace interface to what I hope will > >>be the long-term stable interface. Provisions are included for extending > >>the interface later. The patches address performance and cleanliness > >>concerns. > > [...] > >But the general question is: do you still plan to switch to a syscall > >interface? > > I don't have any present plans for that. Maybe when the interface starts > to evolve at a slower pace, or if it is shown to be significantly faster. > > Not that interface stabilization here doesn't mean a freeze; it means that > backwards compatibility starts when this gets merged.
If the interface is considered to be stable you can get rid of the KVM_GET_API_VERSION ioctl, since the version can't change anymore, right? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
