>Dor Laor wrote: >> >> Do you know why Xen guy choose of implementing it in Xen? Why didn't >> they rip Qemu implementation? >> >With PIC in Xen, CPU2K gets 6.5% performance gain in old 1000HZ linux >kernel, KB gets 14% gain. We also did a shared PIC model which share > PIC state among Qemu & VMM with less LOC in VMM, it can get >similar performance gain (5.8% in my test). >BTW, at that time, PIT is in VMM already. >Eddie
Thanks for the info, I suspected most chances the performance gain is small. So for the sake of the next arguments, what was the fuel running the decision of moving all the X-PI[c|t] things into the Xen? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel