Gregory Haskins wrote: > Hi Avi, > > I believe I have incorporated all of the changes requested. Please find the > result of that patch inline. > > Note that I finally understand what you were getting at with the array of > objects thing. I didn't change it yet for the same reason that you > mentioned: reduction of churn. However, now that I understand it, I see why > you wanted it. Perhaps I will send a follow-on to this patch that uses your > idea. But for now... >
I will try to be more explicit in the future. > --- > > KVM: Add support for in-kernel mmio handlers > > There is a near-term need for moving some of the emulation from userspace to > the kernel (e.g. interrupt handling). This patch adds a construct for > registering in-kernel MMIO handlers. The consumers of this interface will > appear in a follow-on patch. > Given that the first consumer is the local apic, it makes sense to add the vcpu-local bus first, no? -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
