>>
>> Superb results, when I run the old in- kernel apic I got much higher
idle
>> cpu consumtion. I know that's vmenter- vmexit latency was drastically
>> improved but 0- 1% cpu consumption for winxp 32 bit sounds too good
to be
>> true.
>> Are you sure an ACPI HAL is used in the guest? (can be checked by
>> looking at the computer node in the device manager).
>
>I did a clean install and didn't change it over to StandardPC.  The
Control
>Panel says "ACPI Uniprocessor PC" or something like that (recalling
from
>memory right now).  As a third datapoint, I am seeing the TPR changing
>rapidly (which I would expect 0 changes if the ACPI stuff was
disabled).

Great, I was a little skeptical (sorry for that) since several months
ago when I tested the in-kernel-apic the idle time was much worse. After
talking today with Avi, he said his vmentry-exit latency drastically
improved performance and even the qemu's apic can reach these figures.
I'm sure that with load, you implementation will achieve performance
advantage.

>
>> I noticed the kvm_stat below, there are no mmio exits. You need to
>> update the statistics.
>
>Yeah, this is fixed in my latest code which I will send out soon.  I
>actually added a "light_mmio" and "apic_mmio" stat so we can tell the
>difference.  I left mmio_exits to count the ones that go to userspace.

Thanks, for the ultra-fast responsiveness.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to