Avi Kivity wrote:
> Jeff Dike wrote:
>
>> It looks like kvm_hypercall is trying to match the system call
>> convention and mixed up the call number and first argument in the
>> 32-bit case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> --
>> drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> Index: kvm/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- kvm.orig/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> +++ kvm/drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> @@ -1351,8 +1351,8 @@ int kvm_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> } else
>> #endif
>> {
>> - nr = vcpu->regs[VCPU_REGS_RBX] & -1u;
>> - a0 = vcpu->regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX] & -1u;
>> + nr = vcpu->regs[VCPU_REGS_RAX] & -1u;
>> + a0 = vcpu->regs[VCPU_REGS_RBX] & -1u;
>> a1 = vcpu->regs[VCPU_REGS_RCX] & -1u;
>> a2 = vcpu->regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX] & -1u;
>> a3 = vcpu->regs[VCPU_REGS_RSI] & -1u;
>>
>>
>
> Anthony? I think you were hacking this area?
>
I make a similar change in my series.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
