Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 12:23:24PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> No, it means disallowing pci devices that use shared irqs, and allowing >> pci devices that use non-shared irqs. >> > > Most machiens I see today have almost no chance of having PCI devices > without shared IRQs. This probably means any implementation will only > work on a small set of machines with very specific setup in terms of > which PCI slots they install cards in, and only as long as you don't > allow any type of hotplugging of devices (or ever changing hardware at > all). May not be worth implementing if it has such a limited use case. > The MSI setup on the other hand does sound like it might have potential > for working in general. > >
Looking at two random servers here and a desktop, interrupts are unshared except for usb. A laptop was not so lucky. So "no chance" is a bit extreme. I agree it's far from optimal, but it is less limited than you imply. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
