> > This is what I'd like. The kernel apic state doesn't have to > be exactly > equal to APICState; we just have to write functions to convert into > APICState and back. That ensures the protocol doesn't change. > > (in this way we can even switch kernel apic on and off at runtime > (not that we want to)). > > >> BTW, we will take half week leave next week, will u work on apic >> too? thx,eddie >> > > Yes. Let me know when you leave so we don't conflict. > I will leave next Tuesday evening :-(
BTW, can anybody do more testing on stability of lapic2 branch after you pulled in 3 pending patches? I will ask Intel guys to do too. I expect there will have some time to get it into certain level of stability. Eddie ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
