Anthony Liguori wrote: > I don't think adding annotations as snapshots is the right approach. I > think proper support should be added in the header. I wouldn't be too > concerned with breaking compatibility in qcow2. That's why it's qcow2 > and not just an updated version of qcow, qcow2 is still, AFAIK, open for > breakage. >
Are all the users' images open for breakage too? -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
