Zachary Amsden wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: >> >> We haven't seen any issue with the 2.6.22 boot decompressor. Which >> of the four (fs, gs, ldt, or tr) were proving problematic and why? > > It was tr that was affecting Workstation, since we boot through normal > BIOS path, and only a 16-bit task was loaded at this point. >
Ah. Maybe we didn't have an exit while we were in long mode with the 16-bit tss, so VT didn't notice the illegal combination. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
