Avi Kivity wrote: > Paul Brook wrote: >>> Yes, good thinking, but this should only be done if it actually impacts >>> something. Reducing overhead from 0.1% to 0.05% is not worthwhile >>> if it >>> introduces extra complexity. >>> >> >> >> If the overhead is that small, why are we touching this code in the >> first place? >> > > Accuracy is much more important from my point of view. Also, the > reduction in the number of signals delivered when the guest uses 100Hz > is significant. >
You'd also get better battery life on laptops. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
