On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 20:49 +0300, Alexey Eremenko wrote: > Anthony Liguori wrote: > >I've tested this on VT and it works nicely. > > Excuse me, but you said several months ago something about "kvm-xen", > which doesn't requires VT CPUs. > > Will you publish or merge that technology ? (as I don't have > VT-capable CPU at Home)
Rusty Russell is working on something better called kvm-lite. He's giving a talk at this week's KVM forum and I suspect that we'll see patches soon. Regards, Anthony Liguori > ============================================================= > Anyways, I'm very happy to hear about KVM adding paravirtualization to > the portfolio. Now the features are close to Xen. > > Namely, Xen has: > > Linux host 32/64-bit > Guests 32/64-bit > Full Virtualization requires VT (Guests: any) > Para-Virtualization works on any x86 processor (Guests: Linux) > Host/Guest SMP > > KVM will also have all of above now, with your patch. But will it be > able to work on non-VT CPUs ? > > -- > -Alexey Eremenko "Technologov" > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > kvm-devel mailing list > kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
