Am 31.08.2007 um 20:54 schrieb Anthony Liguori:

> It makes little sense to pass a directory when you can pass a config
> file and assume that the directory the config file is in is the CWD.

In fact, most people having designed bundle-type document formats  
came to a different conclusion: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundle_ 
(NEXTSTEP)>. Typically, bundles are opaque and appear like a single  
file to the desktop user.

> [...] And then do:
>
> qemu -c MyImage/vm.cfg

In opposite to "qemu -c MyImage" ?

Why do you want the user to do extra typing? There's one config in  
one directory, so typing the config file name is just redundant.


To me, Jorge's implementation looks just fine.


>> +           "usage: %s [options] [disk_image|folder]\n"
                 "usage: %s [options] [diskimage | bundle]\n"
                                                   ^^^^^^
Go ahead an call the baby by it's name?


m$0.02
Markus

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/





-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to