Jim Paris wrote: >> And regarding the patches in the dos format, I tried sending patches to >> my yahoo/gmail account and I don't see them in the DOS format. It's >> strange it is reaching you in the DOS format. I don't know a way to >> avoid it right now. Please let me know if there is any known trick or >> method to avoid this issue. >> > > Your attachments look correct to me. They have CR/LF endings in the > base64 encoded data, but that is the correct "canonical form" for > text/* attachments as described by MIME (RFC2049 etc). Avi, I think > your client should be converting to the "local form" when you save > them -- Evolution and Mutt at least do this. > >
Okay. I'll just run dos2unix then, and file a bug report against thunderbird. > Regardless, Nitin might be able to avoid the problems by sending the > attachments with a non-text mime-type, maybe by renaming them to *.dat? > > That might cause them not to be viewed inline, so I'd rather not. -- Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
