Sander van Leeuwen wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: > >> Sander van Leeuwen wrote: >> >>> You may want to reconsider as KVM breaks VMWare server 1.3 on 64 bits >>> linux hosts as well. In exactly the same way >>> as it breaks VirtualBox. >>> >>> We have tried this ourselves and others have reported the same: >>> - http://www.vmware.com/community/message.jspa?messageID=718184 >>> - http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-list/2007-June/msg02501.html >>> >>> >> This is unsurprising. But I believe the same solution (rmmod >> kvm-intel) will work for VMware as well as for VirtualBox, or anything >> else that wants to use VT. >> >> Can you explain what is wrong with it? It is simple, requires no >> kernel changes, and has no present and potential future performance >> impact. It will work on all kernel versions, unlike any change you >> may wish us to make. >> >> > This was just an added note. More meant for distribution maintainers who > feel it is necessary to activate KVM by default. >
Well, you still haven't explained what is wrong with my proposal. Can we make some progress instead of walking in circles? -- Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
