Haydn Solomon wrote: > I've been seeing a lot of news about embedded virtualization in servers > backed by companies like Dell, HP etc. I still think KVM is the right > approach to virtualization however what does this mean for KVM as far as > being a competitor in the hypervisor market? How difficult would it be > for KVM to do something similar? Just wanted to get some thoughts on this.
IBM, HP, Dell, etc. make marketing deals with companies, not open-source communities. So there needs to be a KVM company that can afford to send people to IBM, HP, Dell, etc. to sell the idea. And of course that company needs to have a product to sell, not a technology. Wes Felter - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
