Gildas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It seems there was a lot of regressions on kvm-37. I've tried to
> follow the different patches and problem but the situation is full of
> confusion it seems.
>   

Sure, the lapic merge is large and complex.  Some confusion is to be 
expected.

> Perhaps there is the need for another release including the patches
> that are thought to fix the problem some of us have experienced? It
> would be easier to spot what's working and what's not.
>   

kvm-38 will be released shortly and I'll keep a short release cycle 
until things stabilize.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to