Gildas wrote: > Hi all, > > It seems there was a lot of regressions on kvm-37. I've tried to > follow the different patches and problem but the situation is full of > confusion it seems. >
Sure, the lapic merge is large and complex. Some confusion is to be expected. > Perhaps there is the need for another release including the patches > that are thought to fix the problem some of us have experienced? It > would be easier to spot what's working and what's not. > kvm-38 will be released shortly and I'll keep a short release cycle until things stabilize. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel