Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> Yeah, see, the initial goal was to make it possible to use the KVM >> paravirtualizations on other hypervisors. However, I don't think this >> is really going to be possible in general so maybe it's better to just >> use leaf 0. I'll let others chime in before sending a new patch. >> > > Hm. Obviously you can just define a signature for "kvm-compatible > hypercall interface" and make it common that way, but it gets tricky if > the hypervisor supports multiple hypercall interfaces, including the kvm > one. Start the kvm leaves at 0x40001000 or something? >
Yeah, that works with me. Regards, Anthony Liguori > J > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
