Nakajima, Jun wrote: > To me this is the beginning of fragmentation. Why do we need different > and VMM-specific Linux paravirtualization for hardware-assisted > virtualization? That would not be good for Linux. > >
The only way to have a single interface is if a central authority defines and documents that interface, and all hypervisor implementors agree not to implement extensions. Do you see that happening? -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel