Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Ryan Harper wrote:
> > Playing around with running VMware-server within a KVM guest and
noticed
> > that whenever we launch a VM within the guest, KVM reports a GP
fault in
> > set_cr3.  Removing the fault injection (raised for attempting to set
> > reserved bits) for the non-pae case allows memtest to boot and run
> > within VMWare Server, running in a KVM Linux guest.
> > 
> > This same test (Linux, VMware-server, booting/running memtest iso)
works
> > fine on bare-metal.  Thoughts?
> > 
> 
> Setting reserved bits is different from setting MBZ bits since the
> behaviors undefined.  If something as common as VMware is depending on
> being able to set a reserved bit then perhaps the right thing to do
from
> KVM's perspective is to let it.
> 
> I'm curious if Zach or Jun have any comments about the right thing to
do
> here.
> 

As long as the guest is protected mode (unlike the long mode), the Intel
spec does _not_ say that reserved bits checking is enforced for CR3. As
far as I looked at the AMD spec, looks like #GP is caused even in
protected mode... Does the test work for AMD systems?

> Regards,
> 
> Anthony Liguori
> 


Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel

Reply via email to