Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Also architectually level = 0 may also mean an IRQ to IOAPIC
>> if the polarity is negative though today we may not see this. But
>> this change will expose the risk, and the propose of pass-through
>> hardware device will change the polarity.
>>
>
> Sure, if you run Xen + pci passthrough with the polarity reversal on
> kvm :)
>
> We do want a correct polarity implementation -- I'll do that later
> on. I certainly won't say no to patches...
>
Can't we just do
level ^= polarity;
at the beginning of the function? Then reversed polarity interrupts use
the same code as normal interrupts.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
