Gildas wrote: > Hi, > > I had a problem when moving my windows XP machine from the ACPI HAL to > the standard PC HAL in order to get better performances (as pointed in > http://kvm.qumranet.com/kvmwiki/Windows_ACPI_Workaround): on reboot > the machine would just BSOD with kvm but work with -no-kvm. > > The BSOD message was about intelppm.sys, so I did my homework, > searched on Google and I found a page on Ben Armstrong's Blog: > http://blogs.msdn.com/virtual_pc_guy/archive/2005/10/24/484461.aspx > > The very interesting part of the article is: > > "In the mean time we have made some subtle changes to the way our > hardware exposes the processor in Virtual Server R2 so that in future > products these drivers should never get loaded inside of virtual > machines." > > Should similar tricks be performed in kvm? > kvm have patch that we wrote that let us play with how the cpu expose itself by the meaning of the cpuid instruction. but i believe it is something else ther.e
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
