Avi Kivity wrote: > Farkas Levente wrote: >> hi, >> it seems we've got a real tester:-) for ma all of the bellow are serious >> bugs (tomorrow i'll try to send more detail of our host crash too) and >> imho the latest 'stable' version was kvm-36. wouldn't be better to >> postpone all patches and infrastructure changes (virtio and others) >> until these have been fixed and try to produce a new 'stable' release? >> i understand then everybody (including myself) would like to see these >> new features in the latest and greatest kvm release, but at the same >> time i'd be nice to think about the end users too. >> may some version cane be labeled as stable (eg 36) and the latest as >> devel. this can help a lot for those who are not read this list. >> > > You can use -no-kvm-irqchip to get stability similar to kvm-36. >
Perhaps a workaround for end user could be to disable by default kvm irqchip and
add an option to enable it (--use-kvm-irqchip) ?
Laurent
--
------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------
"Software is hard" - Donald Knuth
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ kvm-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
