Hi Avi,
We also the similar problems, when we enable kvm/ipf. You know,
Qemu doesn't work on IPF both at host and guest sides.
So, we have some changes, and new-added stuffs to current Qemu code. Do
you think which tree we should push them to? Qemu upstream
or kvm-userspace?
Thanks
Xiantao
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
>> Hi,
>> while working on the embedded powerpc port for kvm we have a lot of
>> dependencies on current qemu 0.9.0 code for ppc support. Internally
>> we currently run with a modified qemu, but eventually strive for
>> integration with kvm-userspace. Therefor I wanted to ask if there
>> are already detailed plans (if any) regarding the re-base of
>> kvm-userspace to the new qemu source?
>>
>
> I'm currently debating this. On the one hand, upstream qemu has a lot
> of fixes and new goodies. On the other hand, we still haven't
> recovered completely from the lapic merge and I don't want to rock
> the boat further.
>
> I'll try to merge in the next few days and see what breaks.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
